It's about my view of another incarnation of text/graphic terminals in modern, not so efficient, noisy, but power-saving reality. One, three or more useless x86 cores? Why? Toasters from xbill are finally here?
It's better to have one processor in display and a bit of imagination.
http://www.advogato.org/person/olecom/diary/7.html
(Advogado parsing and html generating is horrible. But i've posted no fully kernel related thing.)
_____
not like this
http://xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/samsung-sm940ux.html
Not like this. This is closed hardware, USB, closed software (e.g. compression algos).
I'd like to have a chip with open source OS, which can be reprogrammed in-system. Compression? Well,
#!/bin/sh
set -e
trap "echo Error" 0
con=/tmp/console#0
[ -p "$con" ] || mkfifo "$con"
open-vt "$con"
exec >$con
echo $compress
exec emacs | $compress
where
compress="dd bs=4k"
compress="gzip -7"
compress="bzip2"
compress="7zip"
or anything else.
Also, the main point is featured text mode. Ethernet 100/1000 can handle anything i guess. 24-25 fps video at least. 3D games? Well, then plug DVI (and thus switch on all 3D toasting) and have fun.