Back to text and graphic terminals.

Submitted by olecom
on April 5, 2008 - 3:32pm

It's about my view of another incarnation of text/graphic terminals in modern, not so efficient, noisy, but power-saving reality. One, three or more useless x86 cores? Why? Toasters from xbill are finally here?

It's better to have one processor in display and a bit of imagination.

http://www.advogato.org/person/olecom/diary/7.html
(Advogado parsing and html generating is horrible. But i've posted no fully kernel related thing.)
_____

not like this

olecom
on
April 5, 2008 - 7:14pm

http://xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/samsung-sm940ux.html

Not like this. This is closed hardware, USB, closed software (e.g. compression algos).

I'd like to have a chip with open source OS, which can be reprogrammed in-system. Compression? Well,

#!/bin/sh
set -e
trap "echo Error" 0
con=/tmp/console#0

[ -p "$con" ] || mkfifo "$con"
open-vt "$con"
exec >$con
echo $compress
exec emacs | $compress

where

compress="dd bs=4k"
compress="gzip -7"
compress="bzip2"
compress="7zip"

or anything else.

Also, the main point is featured text mode. Ethernet 100/1000 can handle anything i guess. 24-25 fps video at least. 3D games? Well, then plug DVI (and thus switch on all 3D toasting) and have fun.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.