Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: bbee
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 4:55 pm

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Johan Torin wrote:

It's working in the sense that I'm seeing packets that are being broadcast 
on the lan coming in as etherip on the gif interface. If the laptop had a 
bridge set up, it would forward them to it, but since it doesn't nothing 
happens to them.


Well, there goes that idea..


Even forgetting the trunk failover, there is no way to give an IP from my 
wired LAN to a remote device that doesn't actually have a connected 
ethernet-like connection avaiable to receive etherip traffic for bridging?

That is, there is no way to use IPSEC on OpenBSD to get the traditional 
"Remote VPN Access" thing where your mobile device is assigned a LAN IP?


Seconded. Maybe tun can be modified to actually accept packets (if it's in 
layer 2 mode, it's being bridged, and tunX was created via ifconfig) 
instead of always returning EHOSTDOWN? 
Then I could simply bridge the gif and tun interface on my laptop, assign 
tun an IP (or trunk it) and have it behave as if it was physically on the 
remote LAN.


Thanks,

bbee
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, bbee, (Thu Sep 11, 11:01 am)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, Giancarlo Razzolini, (Thu Sep 11, 11:13 am)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, bbee, (Thu Sep 11, 12:21 pm)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, Giancarlo Razzolini, (Thu Sep 11, 12:47 pm)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, Johan Torin, (Thu Sep 11, 2:05 pm)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, bbee, (Thu Sep 11, 4:55 pm)
Story Behind 4.4 T-Shirt?, Brian, (Thu Sep 11, 7:27 pm)