Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Johan Torin
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 2:05 pm

On Thursday 11 September 2008, bbee wrote:

Sure.


Yes.


I don't know where you going with this, if your tunnel is working you should 
be able to pass trafic on it. Bridging does not (usually|necessarily) involve 
any specific support in the other end of a bridged interface.


You would probably like to trunk the wired and the wireless interfaces on the 
laptop, and since you're encapsulating the wireless trafic over a gif-tunnel 
you fail since you can't trunk gif-interfaces. Sorry.

Tun-interfaces are trunkable (or atleast I have read so) so that would be a 
way to accomplish this. However, it's a bit ironic that OpenBSDs fancy 
ipsec.conf and friends (and I say this with quite a lot of admiration for 
them) falls short in this sitation. One way to work-around this slight 
short-coming is setup OpenVPN, which (IIRC) binds to tun-interfaces. I have 
however not tested this.


And if someone knows how to setup a tun-tunnel in stock OpenBSD which does not 
involve PPP or something like that, I would like to hear about it. 

/Johan
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, bbee, (Thu Sep 11, 11:01 am)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, Giancarlo Razzolini, (Thu Sep 11, 11:13 am)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, bbee, (Thu Sep 11, 12:21 pm)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, Giancarlo Razzolini, (Thu Sep 11, 12:47 pm)
Re: Confused about bridge/gif/trunk failover, Johan Torin, (Thu Sep 11, 2:05 pm)
Story Behind 4.4 T-Shirt?, Brian, (Thu Sep 11, 7:27 pm)