> > running non-GPL-covered software? Not I. I frequently run OpenSSH,
> > whose license is not the GNU GPL, and is incompatible with the GPL (if
> > my memory serves).
>
> please stop spreading lies (or looking like a fool) by not doing research.
>
> The license of OpenSSH is here:
>
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/LICENCE?rev=HEAD
> According to
>
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html
> this is GPL-compatible (modified BSD license or better).
>
> Thanks for correcting me about that point. I was not sure about it,
> which is why I said "(if my memory serves)" in the text you quoted.
>
> What puzzles me is why you think this mistake was a lie, or that it
> might make me "look like a fool". People normally don't call someone
> a liar, or a fool, because of a little (and tangential) mistake like
> this.