Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Patrick McHardy
Date: Friday, June 4, 2010 - 5:03 am

Jiri Olsa wrote:

That would break reassembly (and thus connection tracking) for cases
where its really intended.


You could use the NOTRACK target to bypass connection tracking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Jiri Olsa, (Fri Jun 4, 4:27 am)
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Patrick McHardy, (Fri Jun 4, 5:03 am)
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Jun 9, 7:16 am)
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Jun 9, 8:15 am)
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Jun 9, 8:16 am)
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Jun 9, 8:20 am)
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Patrick McHardy, (Thu Jun 10, 2:14 am)
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Patrick McHardy, (Thu Jun 10, 3:04 am)
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Jun 11, 2:53 am)
[PATCH] net: IP_NODEFRAG option for IPv4 socket, Jiri Olsa, (Mon Jun 14, 11:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] net: IP_NODEFRAG option for IPv4 socket, Eric Dumazet, (Tue Jun 15, 12:13 am)
Re: [PATCH] net: IP_NODEFRAG option for IPv4 socket, Jiri Olsa, (Tue Jun 15, 2:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] net: IP_NODEFRAG option for IPv4 socket, Eric Dumazet, (Tue Jun 15, 2:49 am)