Le jeudi 15 avril 2010 à 21:00 -0700, George B. a écrit :
quoted text
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > Since this bothers me a bit, I will probably work on this in a near
> > future. (adding real multiqueue capability and RCU to bonding fast
> > paths)
> >
> > Ref: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/152987
> 
> That would be great and you would have my sincere thanks..  And if
> anyone is interested, what we do is take a pair of "top of rack"
> switches and cluster them together so they appear as one switch.
> Configure a LAG consisting of a port on each physical switch to a pair
> of bonded interfaces on the server and use mode 2 bonding.  In normal
> operation, both interfaces are active.  Should one switch experience a
> power or interface failure, the server sees one of the interfaces fail
> but just keeps working on the remaining interface.  There is no
> "failover" event going on.
> 

What kind of traffic do your machines manage exactly ?

On server, you use two ports of the same kind (same number of queues) ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html