huge failed atomic allocation in dccp.

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH updated] net: add ability to clear per-interface network statistics via procfs by Eric Dumazet on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 2:41 pm. (34 messages)

Next thread: Re: hibernate event order question by Tobias Diedrich on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 3:36 pm. (7 messages)
From: Dave Jones
Date: Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 3:20 pm

This strikes me as somewhat bizarre..

modprobe: page allocation failure. order:10, mode:0x20
Pid: 10505, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_64 #1

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8107ee4c>] __alloc_pages+0x351/0x371
 [<ffffffff8109fc0d>] ? sysfs_slab_alias+0x41/0x81
 [<ffffffff81097d90>] alloc_pages_current+0x100/0x109
 [<ffffffff8107e1ac>] __get_free_pages+0xe/0x4d
 [<ffffffff881010bd>] :dccp:dccp_init+0xbd/0x3a5
 [<ffffffff81057627>] sys_init_module+0x193f/0x1a87
 [<ffffffff810a4c90>] ? do_sync_read+0xe7/0x12d
 [<ffffffff81205eab>] ? release_sock+0x0/0xaf
 [<ffffffff8106d543>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x126/0x15a
 [<ffffffff81013073>] ? syscall_trace_enter+0xb5/0xb9
 [<ffffffff8100c052>] tracesys+0xd5/0xda

An order 10 GFP_ATOMIC allocation failing shouldn't really be surprising.
The hash sizing in dccp_init seems to cope with this situation
by trying successively smaller values, but this will cause
spew to the logs whilst it's doing that.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH updated] net: add ability to clear per-interface network statistics via procfs by Eric Dumazet on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 2:41 pm. (34 messages)

Next thread: Re: hibernate event order question by Tobias Diedrich on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 3:36 pm. (7 messages)