Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performance.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 12:08 pm

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

That means you are less optimal than the direct-to-storage-server path 
in NFSv4.1, then........

<waves red flag in front of the bull>

If access controls permit, the ideal would be for the client to avoid an 
intermediary when storing data.  The client only _needs_ a consensus 
reply that their transaction was committed.  They don't necessarily need 
an intermediary to do the boring data transfer work.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions ..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Tue May 13, 10:45 am)
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transact ..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed May 14, 12:40 am)
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transact ..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed May 14, 12:57 am)
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transact ..., Jeff Garzik, (Wed May 14, 12:08 pm)
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transact ..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed May 14, 12:32 pm)
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transact ..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed May 14, 12:38 pm)
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transact ..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Thu May 15, 12:34 am)