Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 - 2:36 pm

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

for example first node with 16g ram, it is into two parts: [0, 2g),
and [4g, 18g).

alloc_bootmem will get allocation from [0, 2g) always until we have
can not find more.

with third patch, it will try to get from [4g, 18g) at first.

second patch is need to applied before third patch, because old way
happenly get under 4g for generic bootmem under 4g

First one is trying not to put page table for [0, 4g) under 512M.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, Yinghai Lu, (Fri Dec 17, 5:58 pm)
[PATCH 0/6] memblock related further cleanup for x86, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Dec 27, 5:47 pm)
[PATCH 1/6] x86: Change get_max_mapped() to inline, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Dec 27, 5:47 pm)
[PATCH 6/6] x86: Rename e820_table_* to pgt_buf_*, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Dec 27, 5:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Dec 28, 1:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, Yinghai Lu, (Tue Dec 28, 2:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Dec 28, 3:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down, Yinghai Lu, (Tue Dec 28, 3:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: Change get_max_mapped() to inline, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Dec 29, 4:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: Change get_max_mapped() to inline, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Dec 29, 4:42 pm)