On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:51:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text
> And the user level approach? I think it's fine too. If you run systemd
> for other reasons (or if the gnome people add it to the task launcher
> or whatever), doing it there isn't wrong. I personally think it's
> somewhat disgusting to have a user-level callback with processes etc
> just to clean up a group, but whatever.  As long as it's not common,
> who cares?
> 
On that note, is there a good reason why the notify_on_release interface
works the way it does? Wouldn't it be simpler if the cgroup simply
provided a file on which a process (e.g. systemd) could block?

I guess it's a little too late at this point considering the old
mechanism will still need to be supported, but it seems like this would
provide a slightly cheaper cleanup path. Just my (perhaps flawed) two
pence.

quoted text
> 
> So guys, calm down. We don't need to hate each other.
>
Thanks for the nudge back to sanity.

Cheers,

- Ben
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/