On 12/11/10 20:11, David Howells wrote:
quoted text
> David Safford<safford@watson.ibm.com>  wrote:
>
>> David, does this look ok to you? If so, I will do two patches, one to
>> fix the helper name throughout the existing tpm.c, and then a new
>> version of the tpm_send patch which uses the new name.
> I prefer my suggestion: Wrapping the module_put() up so that you don't see it
> directly.  Then you don't need to alter tpm_chip_find_get().  I'll argue that
> you don't need to know how tpm_chips are got/put, except in the code that
> wraps it.
>
tpm_chip_find_get() not only gets the tpm_chip, but also searches for it 
given an index in a tpm_chip_list.
tpm_chip_put() is then the name that fits the argument here, given it'll 
only be a wrapper of the tpm_chip put
functionality, not the searching one I assume.

I'll ack any of the two approaches (tpm_chip_put or tpm_chip_find_get 
renaming) in any case.

Rajiv

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/