Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes:This just means that the root kits will switch to patch the first instruction of the entry points instead. So the protection will be zero to minimal, but the overhead will be there forever. Now that I said this I expect it to go in yesterday. -Andi --
| Satyam Sharma | Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Robin Lee Powell | NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested. |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 |
git: | |
| Shawn Pearce | Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Pierre Habouzit | [PATCH] git-revert is one of the most misunderstood command in git, help users out. |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Douglas A. Tutty | OBSD's perspective on SELinux |
| askthelist | Packets Per Second Limit? |
| Christophe Rioux | OpenBSD as host for VMWare Server |
| Daniel J Blueman | [sky2, solved] transmit timeouts and firmware update... |
| Octavian Purdila | [RFC] support for IEEE 1588 |
| Johann Baudy | Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | [resend take 2 0/4] Distributed storage. |
