login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Position Statement on Linux Kernel Modules

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 - 9:09 am

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:29:34AM -0400, Greg Louis wrote:

The problem is exactly what you describe in your last sentence. Hardware
manufacturers are well aware of that and make no effort to provide correct
drivers when they (think they) have a monopoly in certain areas.

What would be needed would be a public list of alternative hardware for
known existing hardware. When big manufacturers will see their hardware
listed there in the "bad" column, with their small competitors on the
same line in the "good" column and with a lower price, they may start
to think a little bit. Also, small manufacturers could use this for
marketting purposes, because they would be listed as direct competitors
for other well-established products.

It should be made with notebooks too. It's a shame to see how you're
nearly forced to have an nvidia graphics card in a notebook nowadays.
It is needed to put a bad reputation to products which embed closed
hardware, and to give a good one to other ones.

If such a list is exhaustive and public, it may become a reference for
new buyers.

Willy

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Position Statement on Linux Kernel Modules, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Jun 23, 9:09 am)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Position Statement on Linux Kernel Modules, David Newall, (Tue Jun 24, 11:02 am)
speck-geostationary