Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Frans Pop
Date: Friday, June 13, 2008 - 9:42 am

On Monday 05 May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:

AFAIK there has been no progress on this issue, which is now listed on the 
regression list for .26 [1]. As there has been no response from any fb 
devs, is someone else maybe willing to have a closer look at this?

I'm still seeing the artifacts with -rc6 and the severity seems to depend 
on what was last displayed: sometimes the whole display is covered with 
colored nonsense, artistic maybe but not desired...

Cheers,
FJP

[1] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10843
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Frans Pop, (Fri May 2, 12:22 pm)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Fri May 2, 12:37 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Jesse Barnes, (Fri May 2, 1:40 pm)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Fri May 2, 2:55 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Jesse Barnes, (Fri May 2, 3:07 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 4, 2:04 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Jesse Barnes, (Mon May 5, 8:57 am)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Mon May 5, 10:00 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Yinghai Lu, (Mon May 5, 10:42 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Jesse Barnes, (Mon May 5, 10:45 am)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Mon May 5, 10:59 am)
Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc, Jesse Barnes, (Mon May 5, 12:04 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?, Venki Pallipadi, (Tue May 6, 3:42 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 12:02 am)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Hugh Dickins, (Wed May 7, 12:18 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Venki Pallipadi, (Wed May 7, 3:36 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Venki Pallipadi, (Wed May 7, 4:23 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Ingo Molnar, (Fri May 9, 3:08 am)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Venki Pallipadi, (Fri May 9, 1:05 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Venki Pallipadi, (Fri May 9, 1:09 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Hugh Dickins, (Fri May 9, 1:48 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Dave Airlie, (Fri May 9, 3:11 pm)
RE: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Fri May 9, 3:20 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Keith Packard, (Fri May 9, 10:45 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Dave Airlie, (Fri May 9, 11:19 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect, Keith Packard, (Fri May 9, 11:29 pm)
Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc, Frans Pop, (Fri Jun 13, 9:42 am)