On 08-05-08 14:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:Thanks much. Definite ACK, very much including on the much better disable message: However, I'm not sure, but: The 'if this happens on the secondary CPU' sounds a bit like this is directly checking the secondary CPU flag but cpu_has_pat translates into boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT), refers always to the boot cpu. Yes, we continued on on the boot CPU after the error message so this triggers, but thought I'd make sure it was also intended this way. If so, never mind... I'm privately again placing this on top. If anyone has any explicit testing suggestion, I'm all ears. Rene.