login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
May
»
4
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Ingo Molnar
Subject:
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
Date: Sunday, May 4, 2008 - 2:04 am
* Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
quoted text
> On Friday 02 May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > This is just a transient issue during VT switch or server exit though, > > right? X functionality isn't affected, and your VTs work fine? > > Transient only. I've just tested again and this time the band was > visible on top of the text on VT1 for about 2 seconds. Then it > disappeared. The artifacts also appear when I log out from KDE (i.e. > without exiting the server), and I also get the messages when logging > out and logging in again. > > I do not see any performance issues, but I've only used this kernel > for a very short time. > > > If so, it might not be a PAT issue but just a different memory > > layout or something (and therefore it would really just be a > > cosmetic bug in the X driver). > > The artifacts may not be a PAT issue directly, but it is a clear > regression for me as I currently have a nice clean screen when X shuts > down. I'm also 100% sure that it is caused by enabling PAT. A kernel > with same config and only PAT disabled does not show the artifacts.
ok, Cc:-ed more folks - this bug has to be resolved regardless of the default selection. Ingo --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Fri May 2, 12:22 pm)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 2, 12:37 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri May 2, 1:40 pm)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 2, 2:55 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri May 2, 3:07 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Sun May 4, 12:10 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun May 4, 2:04 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sun May 4, 1:23 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 8:57 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 9:55 am)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Mon May 5, 10:00 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 10:32 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Yinghai Lu
, (Mon May 5, 10:42 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 10:45 am)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Mon May 5, 10:59 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 11:56 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 11:59 am)
Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 12:04 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Tue May 6, 3:42 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed May 7, 12:02 am)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Hugh Dickins
, (Wed May 7, 12:18 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Wed May 7, 3:36 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Wed May 7, 4:23 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri May 9, 3:08 am)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Fri May 9, 1:05 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Fri May 9, 1:09 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Hugh Dickins
, (Fri May 9, 1:48 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Dave Airlie
, (Fri May 9, 3:11 pm)
RE: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 9, 3:20 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Keith Packard
, (Fri May 9, 10:45 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Dave Airlie
, (Fri May 9, 11:19 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Keith Packard
, (Fri May 9, 11:29 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Sun May 25, 8:08 am)
Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc
, Frans Pop
, (Fri Jun 13, 9:42 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts