On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:44:06AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:If they literaly are 'return 0' you can just remove them, as a non-existing open op will just be fine. Even if clearly does it's own locking please add the BKL for now and let the maintainers sort it out later, better be safe then sorry. Except for that thanks a lot, this is the kind of work that's more productive than all these discussions here :) For some reason about 80 instances seem awfully few, but we've move a lot of device into subsystems from beeing plain chardevs so this might actually be correct. --
| Satyam Sharma | Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Robin Lee Powell | NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested. |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 |
git: | |
| Shawn Pearce | Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Pierre Habouzit | [PATCH] git-revert is one of the most misunderstood command in git, help users out. |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Douglas A. Tutty | OBSD's perspective on SELinux |
| askthelist | Packets Per Second Limit? |
| Christophe Rioux | OpenBSD as host for VMWare Server |
| Daniel J Blueman | [sky2, solved] transmit timeouts and firmware update... |
| Octavian Purdila | [RFC] support for IEEE 1588 |
| Johann Baudy | Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | [resend take 2 0/4] Distributed storage. |
