On Wednesday 14 May 2008 05:00:32 pm Andrew Morton wrote:I've reported problems with -next and ftrace. The timestamps look very similar to what I've seen as well. I don't have those kernels available anymore - I decided to wipe my system and move to a distro where it's easier to test new kernels. However, it stands to reason that it isn't ftrace actually causing the problem. That is quite similar... I'm on a Core2Duo (Dell Inspiron 1420 laptop) and was seeing the problems with GCC4.3 and a pure 64bit userland. DRH -- Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful. --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Antonino Ingargiola | [SOLVED] Serial buffer corruption [was Re: FTDI usb-serial possible bug] |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Peter Teoh | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Jacob Yocom-Piatt | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Florin Andrei | firewall is very slow, something's wrong |
| Karel Kulhavy | OpenBSD kernel janitors |
| Joerg Zinke | openbsd router hardware |
git: | |
| Theodore Ts'o | How do get a specific version of a particular file? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: git versus CVS (versus bk) |
| Ken Pratt | pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Giuseppe Bilotta | git-svn tags and branches |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Wang Jian | drivers/net/phy/marvell.c: 88e1111 can't get out sleep mode |
| Wei Yongjun | Re: [PATCH] DCCP: Fix to reset the connection with Reset Code 5 Option Error while... |
| Auke Kok | [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts |
