On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:03:40PM -0400, Jeff Garzik (jeff@garzik.org) wrote:If cluster is made out of 2-3-4-10 machines, it does want to get maximum single node performance. But I agree that in some cases we have to sacrifice of something in order to find something new. And the larger cluster becomes, for more things we can close eyes on. -- Evgeniy Polyakov --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Satyam Sharma | Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Theo de Raadt | That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Marius ROMAN | 1440x900 resolution problem |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
git: | |
| Martin Langhoff | Re: git versus CVS (versus bk) |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Jeff King | Re: Git vs Monotone |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Matheos Worku | 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X |
| Auke Kok | [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts |
| Wang Jian | drivers/net/phy/marvell.c: 88e1111 can't get out sleep mode |
