Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:That means you are less optimal than the direct-to-storage-server path in NFSv4.1, then........ <waves red flag in front of the bull> If access controls permit, the ideal would be for the client to avoid an intermediary when storing data. The client only _needs_ a consensus reply that their transaction was committed. They don't necessarily need an intermediary to do the boring data transfer work. Jeff --
| Goswin von Brederlow | Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support) |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 |
| Pavel Machek | iwl3945 in 2.6.24-rc1 dies under load |
| Serge E. Hallyn | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Johan Herland | [PATCH 0/6] Refactor the tag object |
| Johan De Messemaeker | Re: People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Mark Levedahl | autoCRLF, git status, git-gui, what is the desired behavior? |
| Dan Farina | backup or mirror a repository |
| Mark Reitblatt | US Export of Cryptography |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Sam Fourman Jr. | Asus Striker Extreme does not support 4GB memory |
| Sunnz | How do I configure sendmail? |
| Patrick McHardy | pkt_sched: add DRR scheduler |
| jamal | [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | [resend take 2 0/4] Distributed storage. |
| Julius Volz | Adding SNAT support to LVS/NAT |
