On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:41:53AM -0700, Sage Weil (sage@newdream.net) wrote:Well, POHMELFS can use up to 90 out of 512 or 1024 on x86, but that just moves a problem a bit closer. IMHO problem can be in fact, that copy can be more significant overhead than per page sockt lock and direct DMA (I belive most of the GigE and above (and of course RDMA) links have scatter-gather and RX checksumming), it has to be tested, so I will change writeback path for POHMELFS to test things. If there will not be any performance degradataion (and I believe there will not be, as long as no improvements, since tests were always network bound), I will use that approach. -- Evgeniy Polyakov --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Satyam Sharma | Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Theo de Raadt | That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Marius ROMAN | 1440x900 resolution problem |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
git: | |
| Martin Langhoff | Re: git versus CVS (versus bk) |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Jeff King | Re: Git vs Monotone |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Matheos Worku | 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X |
| Auke Kok | [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts |
| Wang Jian | drivers/net/phy/marvell.c: 88e1111 can't get out sleep mode |
