Paul E. McKenney wrote:
quoted text >> - For nohz cpus, a poller function [schedule_work(), enabled interrupts]
>> peeks into the per-cpu data of the nohz cpu and checks if it is quiet or if
>> it passed through a quiescent state.
>> If it didn't, then it sets a cpu_data->kick_poller flag and rcu_irq_exit()
>> reports the grace period.
>> No need for an IPI either - rcu has a hook in the irq exit path.
>>
>
> I considered adding a cpu_quiet() on the irq exit path, but eventually
> decided that I should instead place the added overhead in the infrequently
> invoked force_quiescent_state() function. Could be argued either way,
> of course.
>
rcu_irq_exit() is only called on idle cpus.
You are trading time spent by the idle cpu in 'hlt' with "real" cpu time.
quoted text >> Right now, I cheat if a nohz cpu is in a long-running nmi
>> [while(other_cpu_is_in_nmi()) cpu_relax()], but I think I can fix that with
>> an set_need_resched() in the rcu_nmi_exit().
>>
>
> Hmmm... I don't see where the NMI exit path checks the TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> flag, but I could easily be missing something.
>
Good point.
I haven't looked at the issue yet.
Perhaps a smd_send_reschedule(smp_processor_id()) is necessary.
Btw, I found a bug in my state machine: Right now, the state machine
will lock up if all cpus are in nohz mode.
I'm not sure if it applies to your code as well.
--
Manfred
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH, RFC] v7 scalable classic RCU implementation , Manfred Spraul , (Wed Oct 15, 1:13 am)