Re: UML dead with current -git?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 10:47 am

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:17:51 +0200 Philipp Marek wrote:


This doesn't work when there is no include/asm symlink.

It also didn't apply cleanly due to tab(s) being converted
to spaces (but of course I fixed that part).

---
~Randy
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 8:14 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 10:13 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Sep 18, 10:55 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 11:09 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 6:35 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 5:43 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 8:50 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 9:17 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 10:47 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Wed Sep 19, 11:05 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 10:42 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 10:44 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 12:01 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Thu Sep 20, 12:25 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 1:26 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Sep 20, 9:35 am)