Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Monday, September 17, 2007 - 1:57 am

On (17/09/07 00:38), Goswin von Brederlow didst pronounce:

Unless mlock() is being used, it is difficult to place the pages in the
way you suggest. Feel free to put together a test program that forces an
adverse fragmentation situation, it'll be useful in the future for comparing
reliability of any large block solution.


Not unless it's using libhugetlbfs or it's very very early in the
lifetime of the system. Even then, another process faulting at the same
time will break it up.


It's a goal ultimately but not what we do right now. There have been
suggestions of allocating the contiguous pages optimistically in the
fault path and later promoting with an arch-specific hook but it's
vapourware right now.


With grouping pages by mobility, that 4K hole would be on the movable
free lists. To get an unmovable allocation in there, the system needs to
be under considerable stress. Even just raising min_free_kbytes a bit
would make it considerably harder.

With the standard kernel, it would be easier to place as you suggest.


Try writing such a program. I'd be interested in reading it.


Not at the moment. I don't have any of the patches to accurately reflect
it up to date. The eviction patches have rotted to the point of
unusability.


They do grow and shrink. The number of pagetables in use changes for
example.


It doesn't unless you assume the system remains in a steady state for it's
lifetime. Things like updatedb tend to throw a spanner into the works.


And what size should this group be that all workloads function?


If the pages are free, finding them isn't that hard. The memory
compaction patches were able to do it.


That's fair, just not cheap


64K contiguous chunks is what Andrea's apprach seeks to do so lets see what
that looks like. Or lets see if Nick's approach makes the whole exercise
pointless


This is true and one of the reasons that Andrea's approach will go a
long way for large blocks. This observation is also why I suggested
having slub_min_order set the same as the largeblock size when
Christophs approach was used to have this allocating/freeing of
same-sized chunks.


They were generated using trace_allocmap kernel module in
http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/projects/vmregress/vmregress-0.81-rc2.tar.gz
in combination with frag-display in the same package.  However, in the
current version against current -mm's, it'll identify some movable pages
wrong. Specifically, it will appear to be mixing movable pages with slab
pages and it doesn't identify SLUB pages properly at all (SLUB came after
the last revision of this tool). I need to bring an annotation patch up to
date before it can generate the images correctly.


It's expected even.


That is a tunable I'd rather avoid because it'll be impossible to recommend
a proper value - I would sooner recommend increasing min_free_kbytes. It's
and not something I'm likely to investigate until we really know we need
it. I would prefer to see how Nick's, Christoph's and Andrea's approaches
get on before taking those type of steps.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

-- 
-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 10, 11:03 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Tue Sep 11, 5:05 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Tue Sep 11, 9:02 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Tue Sep 11, 9:47 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Maxim Levitsky, (Tue Sep 11, 11:25 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Tue Sep 11, 12:20 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 1:01 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 1:03 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 1:07 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 1:11 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 1:13 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 1:41 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 1:42 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 2:35 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 2:41 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 2:48 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 2:52 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Tue Sep 11, 4:26 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 5:00 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 11, 5:04 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Wed Sep 12, 1:20 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Martin J. Bligh, (Wed Sep 12, 7:29 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Wed Sep 12, 4:06 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Wed Sep 12, 4:17 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Thu Sep 13, 7:38 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Fri Sep 14, 9:10 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 14, 10:52 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 14, 11:08 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 14, 11:15 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Fri Sep 14, 5:31 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Fri Sep 14, 5:33 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sat Sep 15, 5:14 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Sat Sep 15, 8:51 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sat Sep 15, 1:14 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Sat Sep 15, 3:30 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sun Sep 16, 6:54 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Sun Sep 16, 8:08 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Linus Torvalds, (Sun Sep 16, 11:15 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Linus Torvalds, (Sun Sep 16, 11:44 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Sun Sep 16, 11:50 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Sun Sep 16, 2:31 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sun Sep 16, 2:58 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sun Sep 16, 3:06 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sun Sep 16, 3:38 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sun Sep 16, 3:48 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sun Sep 16, 3:51 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sun Sep 16, 3:56 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Mel Gorman, (Mon Sep 17, 1:57 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 17, 3:00 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 17, 3:03 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 17, 3:05 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 17, 3:10 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 17, 3:21 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Sep 18, 11:30 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Tue Sep 18, 12:18 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Tue Sep 18, 12:31 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Sep 18, 12:44 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 18, 1:36 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 18, 1:42 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Wed Sep 19, 7:04 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Thu Sep 20, 7:54 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Thu Sep 20, 11:07 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Thu Sep 20, 11:11 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sat Sep 22, 10:50 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sat Sep 22, 11:22 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sat Sep 22, 11:49 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Goswin von Brederlow, (Sat Sep 22, 11:56 pm)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Andrea Arcangeli, (Mon Sep 24, 8:39 am)
Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 24, 2:13 pm)