On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:16:03 +0200
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:

quoted text
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:14:21 +0200 (CEST)
> > Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> ...
> >> And one more update:
> >> There is SAS too,
> ...
> >> +	  You need it
> >> +	  - for classic parallel SCSI hardware,
> >> +	  - for newer SCSI transports such as Fibre Channel, FireWire storage,
> >> +	    SAS, or iSCSI,
> > 
> > There is SRP too.
> 
> I think I'll rewrite it as "for newer SCSI transports such as FireWire
> storage."  ;-)
> 
> If SRP was in, can 'such as' be omitted?  "for newer SCSI transports
> (Fibre Channel, FireWire storage, iSCSI, SAS, SRP),"

It might be necessary to add SSA too.


quoted text
> Or would be "for newer SCSI transports such as Fibre Channel,
> FireWire storage, iSCSI, SAS, and more," be OK?

scsi-ml has SPI, FC, iSCSI, SAS, and SRP transport classes (SRP is in
scsi-misc now). It's a bit strange to omit only SRP, I think. But I
might be too SRP-biased.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/