On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:40:59AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:... I am trying to read that last sentence and it just doesn't seem to make any sense. Or are you saying that all that anti-tivoization language that adds complex requirements which change depending on the market some device happens to be sold in and which will most likely make GPLv3 software unusable for various applications ranging from medical equipment to financial transaction systems (and probably others) is there to just make it a _bit_ more inconvenient for vendors to implement a tivo-like scheme? So what exactly is the point of all this then? Jan -
