On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Jesper Juhl wrote:You're seeing that the wrong way. The correct response is (and I quote from the manual, pick one talking point at random): "This is a great step for freedom, as the users now have exactly the same rights as the vendors." "When we talk about free software, we don't talk about 'free as in beer', we talk about 'free as in buggy and unfixable'" "You're now at least no less free than anybody else!" "Oh, except for the fact that those other people still design the hardware you are using, and the programs you watch. But we have a plan for that too! We will make the GPLv4 outlaw Disney and Britney Spears!" "In order to protect your freedoms, we sometimes have to take some freedoms away. In particular, the freedom of critical thinking got revoked last year, because people were just too 'confused'" "There are no American Infidels in Baghdad. Never!" There's a long list of those things, but sadly I didn't have time to copy them all when I sneaked into the FSF main office in my ninja suit under the cover of darkness. Linus -
| Greg KH | Og dreams of kernels |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support |
| Arnd Bergmann | Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables |
| Mark Brown | [PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset |
| Tony Breeds | [LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config |
git: | |
| Brian Downing | Re: Git in a Nutshell guide |
| John Benes | Re: master has some toys |
| Matthias Lederhofer | [PATCH 4/7] introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree |
| Alexander Sulfrian | [RFC/PATCH] RE: git calls SSH_ASKPASS even if DISPLAY is not set |
| Juni |
