Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Gene Heskett
Date: Monday, March 12, 2007 - 9:04 pm

On Monday 12 March 2007, Nish Aravamudan wrote:

Well, that's clear enough, but what of the double $$ case?  Would this 
them make a PID unique to each invocation untill it finally wraps a 16 
bit value, or will the kernel re-use them because they won't all be 
running simultainiously, but limited by the number of unique 'spindle' 
numbers on the system, this to prevent as best as it can, the thrashing 
of a drive by having tar working on 2 separate (or more) partitions at 
the same time.  In my case 2 are possible, as /var is on a separate 
drive.




-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
"Say yur prayers, yuh flea-pickin' varmint!"
-- Yosemite Sam
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RSDL-mm 0.28, Matt Mackall, (Sat Mar 10, 6:35 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 10, 7:28 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Andrew Morton, (Sat Mar 10, 8:16 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Andrew Morton, (Sat Mar 10, 8:39 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, William Lee Irwin III, (Sat Mar 10, 8:43 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 10, 8:44 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 10, 8:59 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Matt Mackall, (Sat Mar 10, 9:01 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Matt Mackall, (Sat Mar 10, 9:03 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 10, 11:19 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Mar 11, 12:32 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Sun Mar 11, 10:38 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Con Kolivas, (Sun Mar 11, 10:48 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Sun Mar 11, 11:37 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 3:04 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Douglas McNaught, (Mon Mar 12, 5:51 am)
RE: RSDL-mm 0.28, David Schwartz, (Mon Mar 12, 6:22 am)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Ray Lee, (Mon Mar 12, 7:54 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 11:28 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Douglas McNaught, (Mon Mar 12, 11:46 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 12:10 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Lee Revell, (Mon Mar 12, 12:14 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Douglas McNaught, (Mon Mar 12, 12:43 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Patrick Mau, (Mon Mar 12, 12:54 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 1:24 pm)
Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Douglas McNaught, (Mon Mar 12, 6:32 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 7:39 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Nish Aravamudan, (Mon Mar 12, 8:01 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 9:04 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Willy Tarreau, (Mon Mar 12, 9:45 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 10:48 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Nick Piggin, (Tue Mar 13, 12:22 am)