On Wed, Nov 07 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
quoted text
> On 11/06, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 06 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > (I guess this patch is not complete, overflow is still possible)
> >
> > Hmm, where would it overflow?
> 
> What if the queue was idle long enough (no !CLASS_IDLE requests) so that
> jiffies wraps into the past wrt ->last_end_request?
> 
> IOW, perhaps something like the patch below makes some sense. Of course,
> this is only a theoretical problem, I'm not sure we really need a fix.

OK I see what you mean, probably pretty much a theoretical problem only.
But that doesn't mean it should be fixed, I've applied your patch. It
also collects the two paths enabling the idle class timer, so I consider
it a cleanup as well as it improves readability.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/