Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ahmed S. Darwish
Date: Monday, November 5, 2007 - 2:41 am

On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:28:48PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:

Ok, Could someone suggest a better idea please ?. 

I thought about packing the rules in a structure and sending
it over an ioctl() command. Is this applicable ?

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Mon Nov 5, 2:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 10:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 10, 12:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 11, 11:37 am)