Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Saturday, November 24, 2007 - 3:25 pm

> Very strange indeed. Another possibility is that there is a hardware

Actually, that's a possibility yes, though generally Apple put all temp.
monitoring chips elsewhere, it could well be the case.

Ben.


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sun Nov 18, 4:16 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Roger Leigh, (Wed Nov 21, 2:42 am)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Nov 21, 12:58 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Michael Buesch, (Wed Nov 21, 1:13 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Nov 21, 1:17 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Roger Leigh, (Wed Nov 21, 4:56 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Nov 21, 5:00 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Michael Buesch, (Fri Nov 23, 9:00 am)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Jean Delvare, (Fri Nov 23, 3:29 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Fri Nov 23, 6:11 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Jean Delvare, (Sat Nov 24, 2:29 am)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Michael Buesch, (Sat Nov 24, 7:18 am)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Jean Delvare, (Sat Nov 24, 3:20 pm)
Re: radeonfb i2c regression post-2.6.18., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sat Nov 24, 3:25 pm)