Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86: TLS cleanup

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Zachary Amsden
Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 11:34 am

On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 02:25 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:


That was the other redundant definition, thanks.

I had a bit of trouble verifying correctness here because of much
brownian motion.  Any possibility of a pure movement / fixup separation
to make it easier on the eyes?

Zach

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/5] x86: get_desc_base, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 21, 3:19 am)
[PATCH 2/5] x86: use get_desc_base, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 21, 3:20 am)
[PATCH 3/5] x86: ptrace fs/gs_base, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 21, 3:21 am)
[PATCH 4/5] x86: desc_empty, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 21, 3:23 am)
[PATCH 5/5] x86: TLS cleanup, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 21, 3:25 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86: TLS cleanup, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Nov 21, 4:58 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: use get_desc_base, Zachary Amsden, (Wed Nov 21, 11:30 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86: TLS cleanup, Zachary Amsden, (Wed Nov 21, 11:34 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86: TLS cleanup, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 21, 3:37 pm)
[replacement PATCH 5/6] x86: tls32 moved, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 21, 3:38 pm)
[replacement PATCH 6/6] x86: TLS cleanup, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 21, 3:39 pm)
Re: [replacement PATCH 6/6] x86: TLS cleanup, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Nov 22, 2:10 am)