* Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted text > To answer your latest mail, again I don't have numbers but from my
> point ov view:
>
> 23.1 < 23.1+ck < 23.8+cfs.24
>
> where 23.1+ck is slightly better than vanilla 23.1 and 23.8+cfs.24 is
> much better than 23.1+ck.
>
> My workload is pretty standard, F8+kde+firefox+kmail+amsn, some kernel
> compile and so on.
do you remember which particular workload improved the most, and in
roughly whatway? (no need for numbers - subjective impressions are
accurate enough for this)
Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, ... , Ingo Molnar , (Wed Nov 21, 3:39 am)