[snip]

quoted text
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 5fd65d8..90518e4 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ static int __kprobes unsupported_inst(uint template, uint  slot,
>  	qp = kprobe_inst & 0x3f;
>  	if (is_cmp_ctype_unc_inst(template, slot, major_opcode, kprobe_inst)) {
>  		if (slot == 1 && qp)  {
> -			printk(KERN_WARNING "Kprobes on cmp unc"
> -					"instruction on slot 1 at <0x%lx>"
> +			printk(KERN_WARNING "Kprobes on cmp unc "
> +					"instruction on slot 1 at <0x%lx> "
>  					"is not supported\n", addr);
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static int __kprobes unsupported_inst(uint template, uint  slot,
>  			 * bit 12 to be equal to 1
>  			 */
>  			if (slot == 1 && qp) {
> -				printk(KERN_WARNING "Kprobes on test bit"
> -						"instruction on slot at <0x%lx>"
> +				printk(KERN_WARNING "Kprobes on test bit "
> +						"instruction on slot at <0x%lx> "
>  						"is not supported\n", addr);
>  				return -EINVAL;
>  			}

Is it really neccessary for this fragment to create a line that
is greater than 80 characters long? Persumably the entire reason
that the printk line was split in the first place was to avoid
a long line.

[snip]

-- 
Horms

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/