On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:37:53PM -0700, David Miller wrote:So can we please do swap over network storage only first? All these VM bits look conceptually sane to me, while the changes to the swap code to support nfs are real crackpipe material. Then again doing that part properly by adding address_space methods for swap I/O without the abuse might be a really good idea, especially as the way we do swapfiles on block-based filesystems is an horrible hack already. So please get the VM bits for swap over network blockdevices in first, and then we can look into a complete revamp of the swapfile support that cleans up the current mess and adds support for nfs insted of making the mess even worse. -
| Pardo | Re: pthread_create() slow for many threads; also time to revisit 64b context switc... |
| Paul Jackson | Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) |
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | Re: [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() |
| Peter Zijlstra | Re: Btrfs v0.16 released |
git: | |
| Giuseppe Bilotta | Re: gitweb and remote branches |
| Miklos Vajna | [rfc] git submodules howto |
| JD Guzman | C# Git Implementation |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH] fix parallel make problem |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Steve B | SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Marius ROMAN | 1440x900 resolution problem |
| Tomasz Grobelny | [PATCH 0/5] [DCCP]: Queuing policies |
| Dushan Tcholich | Re: ksoftirqd high cpu load on kernels 2.6.24 to 2.6.27-rc1-mm1 |
| John Heffner | Re: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
| Denys Fedoryshchenko | Re: Could you make vconfig less stupid? |
