Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 24

Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Simon Arlott
Subject: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 - 4:50 am

I currently have an LSM that only handles permissions for socket_bind
and socket_listen, I load it and then "capability" as secondary on
boot - but now I can't because the LSM framework is now just the LS
framework.

Why can't this "static LSM" change be a Kconfig option?
(I don't want to have to maintain my own reverted copy of security/,
or compile this into the kernel because then I can't ever modify and
reload it without rebooting.)

-- 
Simon Arlott
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Oct 17, 7:18 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Andreas Gruenbacher, (Fri Oct 19, 1:26 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Oct 19, 1:40 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, James Morris, (Fri Oct 19, 2:07 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Oct 20, 4:05 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, James Morris, (Sat Oct 20, 3:57 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Oct 21, 3:59 pm)
Re: Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Sun Oct 21, 6:12 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Oct 22, 9:09 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], James Morris, (Mon Oct 22, 9:56 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Oct 22, 9:57 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Chris Wright, (Mon Oct 22, 10:16 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Giacomo Catenazzi, (Mon Oct 22, 10:44 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 1:55 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 2:10 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Chris Wright, (Tue Oct 23, 2:13 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 2:13 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 2:14 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Giacomo A. Catenazzi, (Tue Oct 23, 2:14 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 2:18 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Serge E. Hallyn, (Tue Oct 23, 8:20 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 23, 8:28 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Serge E. Hallyn, (Tue Oct 23, 8:34 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 23, 5:31 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Chris Wright, (Tue Oct 23, 5:32 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch], Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Oct 23, 10:06 pm)
Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to ..., Simon Arlott, (Wed Oct 24, 4:50 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Adrian Bunk, (Wed Oct 24, 5:55 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Wed Oct 24, 11:11 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 11:51 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Wed Oct 24, 11:59 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 12:04 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Crispin Cowan, (Wed Oct 24, 1:18 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 1:46 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., David P. Quigley, (Wed Oct 24, 2:02 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 2:29 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Serge E. Hallyn, (Wed Oct 24, 2:37 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 2:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 2:51 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 2:58 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., David P. Quigley, (Wed Oct 24, 3:02 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., David P. Quigley, (Wed Oct 24, 3:04 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Adrian Bunk, (Wed Oct 24, 3:31 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 3:58 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 24, 4:13 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Adrian Bunk, (Wed Oct 24, 4:32 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Oct 24, 4:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Chris Wright, (Wed Oct 24, 5:23 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Ray Lee, (Wed Oct 24, 5:35 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Chris Wright, (Wed Oct 24, 5:41 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 6:03 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Peter Dolding, (Wed Oct 24, 6:26 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Alan Cox, (Wed Oct 24, 6:41 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 24, 6:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., david, (Wed Oct 24, 6:50 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., david, (Wed Oct 24, 7:11 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Oct 24, 7:19 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Kyle Moffett, (Wed Oct 24, 8:50 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Bernd Petrovitsch, (Thu Oct 25, 2:19 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Thu Oct 25, 3:23 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Thu Oct 25, 4:38 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Thu Oct 25, 4:44 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Ray Lee, (Thu Oct 25, 9:04 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Oct 25, 10:10 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Ray Lee, (Thu Oct 25, 11:17 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Alan Cox, (Thu Oct 25, 3:21 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Tilman Schmidt, (Thu Oct 25, 4:09 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Greg KH, (Thu Oct 25, 7:56 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., david, (Thu Oct 25, 8:45 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Peter Dolding, (Thu Oct 25, 10:44 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Oct 26, 12:09 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Tilman Schmidt, (Fri Oct 26, 2:46 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Greg KH, (Fri Oct 26, 8:54 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Greg KH, (Fri Oct 26, 8:58 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Simon Arlott, (Fri Oct 26, 9:32 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Adrian Bunk, (Fri Oct 26, 4:26 pm)
eradicating out of tree modules (was: Linux Security *Modu ..., Tilman Schmidt, (Sat Oct 27, 7:07 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Tetsuo Handa, (Sat Oct 27, 7:08 am)
eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Mo ..., Tilman Schmidt, (Sat Oct 27, 7:47 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Stefan Richter, (Sat Oct 27, 10:31 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Oct 27, 11:22 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Oct 27, 11:29 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security ..., Adrian Bunk, (Sat Oct 27, 5:55 pm)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: Linux Security * ..., Adrian Bunk, (Sat Oct 27, 6:21 pm)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Stefan Richter, (Sun Oct 28, 2:25 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Oct 28, 5:01 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Stefan Richter, (Sun Oct 28, 7:37 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Simon Arlott, (Sun Oct 28, 7:59 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Oct 28, 9:55 am)
RE: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Hua Zhong, (Sun Oct 28, 11:48 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Oct 28, 11:51 am)
RE: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Hua Zhong, (Sun Oct 28, 12:05 pm)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Oct 28, 12:25 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Oct 28, 12:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Oct 28, 1:46 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Crispin Cowan, (Sun Oct 28, 3:08 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Alan Cox, (Sun Oct 28, 3:50 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Peter Dolding, (Sun Oct 28, 4:55 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Oct 28, 10:12 pm)
Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework], Jan Engelhardt, (Mon Oct 29, 4:51 pm)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Tilman Schmidt, (Mon Oct 29, 5:29 pm)
Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Fram ..., Lee Revell, (Mon Oct 29, 5:46 pm)
Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Fram ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Mon Oct 29, 6:19 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Toshiharu Harada, (Mon Oct 29, 8:23 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Toshiharu Harada, (Mon Oct 29, 8:37 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 30, 1:40 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Crispin Cowan, (Tue Oct 30, 1:50 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Toshiharu Harada, (Tue Oct 30, 2:21 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 30, 2:27 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Bernd Petrovitsch, (Tue Oct 30, 2:41 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Tue Oct 30, 6:11 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Xavier Bestel, (Tue Oct 30, 6:19 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules, Greg KH, (Tue Oct 30, 8:30 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., Crispin Cowan, (Sun Nov 4, 11:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ..., serge, (Mon Nov 26, 1:42 pm)