Re: fixed memory bytes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mulyadi Santosa
Date: Tuesday, January 4, 2011 - 11:25 am

Hi..

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 01:22, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@gmail.com> wrote:


well, AFAIK by mapping that new type into native one...for example,
let's say I have "u_int", which in turn when this code is compiled for
x86 32 bit, it is a typedef of "int".

-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
fixed memory bytes, mohit verma, (Tue Jan 4, 10:40 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, Mulyadi Santosa, (Tue Jan 4, 10:58 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, Rajesh S R, (Tue Jan 4, 11:07 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, mohit verma, (Tue Jan 4, 11:22 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, John Mahoney, (Tue Jan 4, 11:24 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, Mulyadi Santosa, (Tue Jan 4, 11:25 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, Denis Kirjanov, (Tue Jan 4, 12:17 pm)
Re: fixed memory bytes, John Mahoney, (Tue Jan 4, 2:15 pm)
Re: fixed memory bytes, sk.syed2, (Tue Jan 4, 3:20 pm)
Re: fixed memory bytes, julie Sullivan, (Tue Jan 4, 3:59 pm)