Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Shawn O. Pearce
Date: Saturday, March 27, 2010 - 12:32 pm

A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> wrote:

Frell.

We can't ask Linus to rewrite his history to repair this breakage.
The fact that its made it into the kernel history means we have
to accept this.  The kernel project is simply too large and move
too fast for us to ask them to fix their repository history.
Smaller projects of 1-2 people, we could have gotten away with
asking them to fix their history.

I guess that answers the questions then.  CGit permits this with
a warning, and must always continue to do that.  And JGit needs to
fix itself to do the same.

-- 
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Mar 26, 2:56 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Jonathan Nieder, (Fri Mar 26, 3:26 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Mar 26, 3:29 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Jonathan Nieder, (Fri Mar 26, 3:40 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Mike.lifeguard, (Fri Mar 26, 3:59 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Mar 26, 4:05 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Mar 26, 4:09 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Mike.lifeguard, (Fri Mar 26, 4:22 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Jonathan Nieder, (Fri Mar 26, 4:49 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Mar 26, 4:50 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Avery Pennarun, (Fri Mar 26, 4:56 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Mike.lifeguard, (Fri Mar 26, 5:00 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Mar 26, 6:22 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Nicolas Pitre, (Fri Mar 26, 6:30 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Mar 26, 6:34 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Nicolas Pitre, (Fri Mar 26, 6:56 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Avery Pennarun, (Fri Mar 26, 7:33 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Mar 26, 10:16 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Scott Chacon, (Sat Mar 27, 5:44 am)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Nicolas Pitre, (Sat Mar 27, 7:21 am)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Shawn O. Pearce, (Sat Mar 27, 12:14 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Shawn O. Pearce, (Sat Mar 27, 12:20 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, A Large Angry SCM, (Sat Mar 27, 12:30 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Shawn O. Pearce, (Sat Mar 27, 12:32 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, A Large Angry SCM, (Sat Mar 27, 12:39 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, A Large Angry SCM, (Sat Mar 27, 12:44 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, A Large Angry SCM, (Sat Mar 27, 12:57 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Mar 27, 1:04 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, A Large Angry SCM, (Sat Mar 27, 1:13 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Mar 27, 1:16 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Avery Pennarun, (Sat Mar 27, 3:16 pm)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, Sitaram Chamarty, (Sun Mar 28, 10:38 am)
Re: Tree with leading '0' modes in 1.7.0.3, A Large Angry SCM, (Sun Mar 28, 4:28 pm)