Re: [PATCH] branch: do not attempt to track HEAD implicitly

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Martin von Zweigbergk
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 5:50 pm

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> wrote:

missing the "it" in "git"


Thanks. This has been on my todo list for a while.

Should it only check for HEAD? How about ORIG_HEAD and FETCH_HEAD?
Simply anything outside of refs/ maybe? Would that make sense?

/Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] branch: do not attempt to track HEAD implicitly, Thomas Rast, (Tue Dec 14, 11:38 am)
Re: [PATCH] branch: do not attempt to track HEAD implicitly, Martin von Zweigbergk, (Tue Dec 14, 5:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] branch: do not attempt to track HEAD implicitly, Martin von Zweigbergk, (Wed Dec 15, 11:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] branch: do not attempt to track HEAD implicitly, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Dec 16, 10:55 pm)