Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Junio C Hamano
Date: Monday, March 23, 2009 - 9:03 am

"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:


Yeah, people can add more as follow-up patches.  The primary purpose of
this series is to clean-up places that the new %name notation (or ~name or
whatever) needs to hook into.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH v2 0/7] Clean up interpret_nth_last_branch feature, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Mar 23, 12:58 am)
[PATCH v2 4/7] Fix branch -m @{-1} newname, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Mar 23, 12:58 am)
[PATCH v2 6/7] check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Mar 23, 12:58 am)
Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules, Shawn O. Pearce, (Mon Mar 23, 6:59 am)
Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Mar 23, 9:03 am)