On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted text
> 
> I think we can add a single bit to "struct packed_git" and in the middle
> of setup_revisions() perform the O(N**2) once, so that find_pack_entry()
> can check the bit without looping.

Yes. However, most users call find_pack_entry() with a NULL ignore_packed, 
so we'd still have to pass in that flag to say whether we should look at 
the bit or not.

However, the real issue (?) I think is that the whole "ignore_packed" 
logic is crazy. It's the wrong way around. The whole thing is broken.

Rather than marking which ones are "unpacked" and should be ignored, it 
should just look at the ones to keep. That's how the filesystem layout 
works and that's what "git repack" does anyway.

So I think we should just remove the whole "--unpacked=" thing, and 
instead replace it with a "--keep" flag - and then only finding things in 
the keep packs if we have a list of them.

That would (a) make the logic a whole lot easier to follow and (b) get rid 
of the scalability issue, since you're not really supposed to have more 
than one or two .keep files anyway (if that).

Nobody uses "--unpacked=xyzzy" by hand anyway. The only thing that 
generates those things is git-repack.sh, so this is not a compatibility 
issue, I suspect.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html