Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text
> 
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Not really local data.  More like _weakly referenced_ data.  If it is
>> there, cool.  If it is not there, no big deal.
> 
> You think it's "cool".
> 
> I think it is "unreliable, random, and depends on the phase of the moon".

I think that shallow clones are not any different from this.  If the
required piece of history is there, cool.  If they're not there, no big
deal.

I understood the hyperbole, but I think that it's not unreliable,
because all it relies on is the uniqueness of SHA1 values.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html