I fully agree. rebase -i is _not_ about the same goal as git-sequencer.
rebase -i is about user interaction. sequencer is about having a common
plumbing for the different porcelains.
And of course, if you want to play games with rebase -i, you can _always_
use the "edit" command (even if you do not plan to edit) to get the commit
name of the new commit.
And you can _always_ use the _full_ commit name to reference the original
commit (at least that is how I planned it: the original _short_ name would
be replaced by the rewritten commit name, but not the _long_ name).
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html