Re: [PATCH 3/7] Documentation: rework SHA1 description in git push

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Anders Melchiorsen
Date: Sunday, November 2, 2008 - 1:13 pm

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:


Right, that was poor wording. When I said "special case", I meant it
as "rare use case".



Oh, I did (obviously) not realize that you can use HEAD in that way,
and actually I cannot read that from the quoted paragraph even now
that I know about it.

It seems to me that HEAD is a special-special case, and that it is not
even mentioned in the current documentation. With my current
understanding, I would say that HEAD can work both as a "branch name"
(that discovers its own name automatically) and as an "arbitrary
SHA-1" (with a detached head).



I find those paragraphs hard to read. The shorter sentences and lack
of parentheses in my patch series was more to my taste. I actually
think that the examples, like explaining master~4, detracts from the
main topic and makes it harder to find the information.




Right.



Cheers,
Anders.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/7] Documentation: rework SHA1 description in ..., Anders Melchiorsen, (Sun Nov 2, 1:13 pm)