| Kernel Panic when schedule is called | 2 hours ago | Linux kernel |
| VPN's on NetBSD | 16 hours ago | NetBSD |
| Why does uClinux 2.6.18 bootup block SuperIO UART IRQs that BIOS configured | 17 hours ago | Linux kernel |
| USB statistics | 18 hours ago | Linux kernel |
| Block Sub System query | 23 hours ago | Linux kernel |
| kernel module to intercept socket creation | 1 day ago | Linux kernel |
| Image size changing during each build | 1 day ago | Linux kernel |
| Soft lock bug | 1 day ago | Linux kernel |
| sysctl - dynamic registration problem | 1 day ago | Linux kernel |
| Question on swap as ramdisk partition | 1 day ago | Linux kernel |
Right is an extreme.
No. Right is an extreme. If you are not extreme, you are always wrong. A compromize can not be right, as it will always contain something wrong.
Say two kids that are told to share candy. One wants it all, the other wants half of it. Will then the compromize (one get 75% and the other 25%) be right, or will the idea about sharing equally be the right one?
(I am not claimning that all extremist are right. Extreme do not right or wrong make. The question is what are you extreme about.)
"And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word." The Bible